The following shows that my Erdős number is 5 or less.
Erdős (has by definition Erdős number = 0)
Paul Erdös, Vance Faber, Jean Larson
Algebra Universalis, Volume 12, Number 1, Pages 81-92, (December 1981)
doi:10.1007/BF02483866
Faber (has therefore Erdős number = 1)
V. Faber, W. Joubert, E. Knill, T. Manteuffel
SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 707-729, (October 1996)
doi:10.1137/S0895479895286748
Knill (has therefore Erdős number ≤ 2)
E. Knill, I. Chuang, R. Laflamme
Phys. Rev. A, Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages 3348-3363, (May 1998)
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.57.3348
Chuang (has therefore Erdős number ≤ 3)
Isaac L. Chuang, Yoshihisa Yamamoto
Phys. Rev. Lett., Volume 76, Issue 22, Pages 4281-4284, (May 1996)
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4281
Yamamoto (has therefore Erdős number ≤ 4)
Georgios Roumpos, Wolfgang H. Nitsche, Sven Höfling, Alfred Forchel, Yoshihisa Yamamoto
Phys. Rev. Lett., Volume 104, Issue 12, Page 126403, (March 2010)
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.126403
Nitsche (has therefore Erdős number ≤ 5)
The value of 5 for my Erdős number is only a upper limit. If you are aware of any additional papers which result in a lower Erdős number for me, please let me know.
[go back]
http://www.stanford.edu/~nitsche/
http://nitsche.mobi